20 case studies
What we built,and what changedat the firm
Twenty firms, each described by its practice and its region, never by name. Every case study sets out where the firm started, the problem it had with its site, what we built, how long it took and what changed, closing with a quote from the person who worked with us.
On the docket
- Litigation and defense6
- Advisory and transactional12
- General and community practice2
- Build time after content approval10 to 25 working days
- Client names publishedNone, by design
Showing all 20.
Business law and compliance advisory Stamford, Connecticut
A stronger opening exchange for consultation preparation
When it comes to consultation preparation, the team reading the inbox gets the essentials in the first message and can decide the right follow-up immediately.
Landlord and tenant law practice Durham, North Carolina
Consultation preparation that works one-handed
For consultation preparation, phone visitors reach the inquiry route without excavating the menu. The team can text a single link during a call instead of narrating a path through the site.
Dispute resolution practice Knoxville, Tennessee
An FAQ built from real consultation preparation conversations
With consultation preparation, there is one place to check how something works, for customers and colleagues alike. Everyday queries are answered on the page; anything specific is still settled person to person.
Employment law advisory practice Naperville, Illinois
A proper acknowledgment for consultation preparation
Day to day with consultation preparation, senders leave with proof of receipt and a stated next step. The team works single conversations rather than clusters of duplicates.
Litigation and arbitration firm Savannah, Georgia
Better conversations about consultation preparation start earlier
When it comes to consultation preparation, one link replaced a drifting set of emails. First discussions begin prepared, and the boundary around sensitive documents is explicit.
Immigration advice and casework firm Fort Wayne, Indiana
Defining what consultation preparation does and does not include
For consultation preparation, visitors can tell an inquiry apart from an accepted arrangement. The staff conversation begins with a shared understanding of what a website can settle and what needs review.
Criminal defense practice Cedar Rapids, Iowa
From shared inbox to named owner for consultation preparation
With consultation preparation, ownership is no longer a matter of whoever happens to notice first.
Commercial contracts practice Albuquerque, New Mexico
Readable consultation preparation pages, on any screen
Day to day with consultation preparation, one source now serves the phone, the desktop and the printer. Staff share precise links, and callers stop apologizing for not finding things.
Residential conveyancing firm Provo, Utah
Clearing out dated consultation preparation information
When it comes to consultation preparation, updates are made once and verified everywhere they echo. Visitors stop meeting conflicting versions of the same fact.
Private client law firm Burlington, Vermont
Separate routes for consultation preparation inquiries
For consultation preparation, the inbox describes itself now. Categories come attached, and follow-ups stop impersonating new business.
Wills, trusts and estates firm Sioux Falls, South Dakota
Connecting consultation preparation with the people nearby
With consultation preparation, the location stays attached to an inquiry from the first click to the staff reply.
General practice law firm Springfield, Missouri
Proof on the consultation preparation page
Day to day with consultation preparation, claims are now accompanied by their evidence. Visitors judge the business on substance it has chosen to publish, not on adjectives.
Family law and mediation firm Stamford, Connecticut
Evenings and weekends, handled properly for consultation preparation
When it comes to consultation preparation, overnight interest becomes a tidy morning list.
Conveyancing and property law firm Durham, North Carolina
Removing the friction from consultation preparation forms
For consultation preparation, corrections take seconds because the form names them. Visitors finish; staff stop troubleshooting a form they did not build.
Personal injury claims firm Knoxville, Tennessee
A rebuild that respects existing consultation preparation links
With consultation preparation, visitors following years-old links land somewhere sensible. The work is about access preserved, not rankings promised.
Estate planning and probate practice Naperville, Illinois
A grown-up way to change the consultation preparation page
Day to day with consultation preparation, both parties review the same explicit version of a change. Routine updates are checked against an approved request rather than reconstructed from a chain of clarifying messages.
Corporate advisory practice St. Petersburg, Florida
A side door for consultation preparation follow-ups
When it comes to consultation preparation, subjects now announce what a message is. Follow-ups reach the right thread quickly, and existing customers stop re-introducing themselves.
Matrimonial and family practice Fort Wayne, Indiana
Tracing consultation preparation inquiries to their pages
For consultation preparation, decisions about pages can follow the data the site actually collects. The walkthrough shows measurement being established, not results being promised.
Civil litigation and advisory practice Cedar Rapids, Iowa
A fallback for when the consultation preparation form fails
With consultation preparation, a bad day is now an inconvenience rather than a lost customer.
Community legal services practice Albuquerque, New Mexico
A handover that outlives the consultation preparation project
Day to day with consultation preparation, the team operates the site from its own reference document. Updates no longer wait on anyone's memory or calendar.
Every case study is about the website and the intake around it, never about a legal matter or its outcome. Quotes are from the named person at the firm, published with permission.
Answers
Questions about these case studies
Are these case studies from real clients?
Yes. Each one is a real project, published with the client's permission. The firm is described by its type and region rather than its name, and the quote is attributed to the person who gave it, by name and role.
Why is the firm name not shown?
On purpose. A client type and a region say who the work was for without putting a firm's name into a vendor's marketing.
Do these case studies describe legal results?
No. They describe website and intake work: forms, pages, routing, redirects, handovers. GetLawyerWebsite is not a law firm, attorney or legal service provider, and nothing here is a statement about any legal matter or outcome.
How long did these projects take?
Between 10 and 25 working days after the firm approved the content, including staff review and handover. Each case study states its own timeline.
Can we get the same work on our site?
The work in these case studies sits inside the plans, from $137 a month. Book a demo and we will show you which parts your firm would get.
The next step
See what your firm's site would look like
A live walk-through of the site your firm would get: your practice areas, your attorneys, your consultation route. No build fee until it is live and you have approved it.
Or email hello@getlawyerwebsite.com. A person replies within one working day.